1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Chrysler | Chevrolet |
Model | 160 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2852 mm |