1972 Chrysler Charger vs. 1988 Italdesign Aspid

To start off, 1988 Italdesign Aspid is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Italdesign Aspid (200 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Italdesign Aspid should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger.

Because 1988 Italdesign Aspid is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Italdesign Aspid will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chrysler Charger 1988 Italdesign Aspid
Make Chrysler Italdesign
Model Charger Aspid
Year Released 1972 1988
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3523 cc 2224 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 200 HP
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1120 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2600 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]