1972 Chrysler Charger vs. 2001 Toyota RSC

To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RSC (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 36 kg more than 1972 Chrysler Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota RSC (284 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota RSC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Chrysler Charger 2001 Toyota RSC
Make Chrysler Toyota
Model Charger RSC
Year Released 1972 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3523 cc 4164 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 138 HP 194 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 272 Nm 284 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1396 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2510 mm