1972 Chrysler Charger vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 920 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler Charger | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Westfield |
Model | Charger | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |