1972 Chrysler Sedan vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Sedan would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Sedan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Sedan. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Sedan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler Sedan (490 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 1972 Chrysler Sedan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 1972 Chrysler Sedan has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Chrysler Sedan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler Sedan | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Sedan | UTE |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 490 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |