1972 Citroen Ami vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1972 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 734 kg more than 1972 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen Ami | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1358 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2960 mm |