1972 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Lada Niva
To start off, 2008 Lada Niva is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lada Niva (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1972 Citroen Ami. (33 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lada Niva weights approximately 560 kg more than 1972 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lada Niva (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen Ami | 2008 Lada Niva | |
Make | Citroen | Lada |
Model | Ami | Niva |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |