1972 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S40 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1972 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S40 (301 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen Ami | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | S40 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |