1972 Citroen Dyane vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1972 Citroen Dyane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1972 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1972 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen Dyane | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Dyane | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2850 mm |
