1972 Citroen Dyane vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1972 Citroen Dyane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 846 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Mini MK I is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Mini MK I (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1972 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Mini MK I should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Mini MK I weights approximately 25 kg more than 1972 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Mini MK I (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen Dyane. (29 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 Mini MK I will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen Dyane.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen Dyane | 1965 Mini MK I | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | Dyane | MK I |
Year Released | 1972 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 29 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |