1972 Citroen Dyane vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1972 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen Dyane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen Dyane. (29 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen Dyane.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen Dyane | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Dyane | MX |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 29 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |