1972 Citroen GS vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen GS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen GS (55 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen GS should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 220 kg more than 1972 Citroen GS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen GS. (72 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen GS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen GS | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GS | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1015 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
