1972 Citroen SM vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Talbot T 26 (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Citroen | Talbot |
Model | SM | T 26 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1890 mm |