1972 Citroen SM vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | SM | Polara |
Year Released | 1972 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2960 mm |