1972 Citroen SM vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | SM | MK X |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 3780 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2900 mm |
