1972 Citroen SM vs. 1964 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1964 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | SM | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 55 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
