1972 Citroen SM vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | SM | 12 M |
Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |