1972 Citroen SM vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | SM | 120 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 144 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |