1972 Citroen SM vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 1975 Volvo 240 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | SM | 240 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |
