1972 Citroen SM vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1983 Lincoln Continental is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1983 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (210 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | SM | Continental |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |