1972 Citroen SM vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | SM | Sigma |
Year Released | 1972 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 118 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2520 mm |