1972 Citroen SM vs. 1988 Opel Omega
To start off, 1988 Opel Omega is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1988 Opel Omega. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1988 Opel Omega.
Because 1988 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Opel Omega. (152 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1988 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Citroen | Opel |
| Model | SM | Omega |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2740 mm |
