1972 Citroen SM vs. 1990 Volvo 780
To start off, 1990 Volvo 780 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 780 (200 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 1990 Volvo 780 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 780. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Volvo 780. (143 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Volvo 780.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1990 Volvo 780 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | SM | 780 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1990 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 80 mm |
Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 213 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2780 mm |