1972 Citroen SM vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | SM | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
