1972 Citroen SM vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (158 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Citroen SM weights approximately 317 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Citroen | Proton |
Model | SM | 400 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2510 mm |