1972 Citroen SM vs. 1997 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1997 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1997 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1997 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1997 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | SM | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 291 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 96.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2880 mm |
