1972 Citroen SM vs. 1999 Donkervoort D8
To start off, 1999 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1999 Donkervoort D8. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1999 Donkervoort D8.
Because 1999 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Donkervoort D8 (235 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 1999 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 1999 Donkervoort D8 | |
Make | Citroen | Donkervoort |
Model | SM | D8 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 235 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2310 mm |