1972 Citroen SM vs. 2000 Mahindra CL

To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Citroen SM weights approximately 150 kg more than 2000 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra CL.

Compare all specifications: