1972 Citroen SM vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (173 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Citroen | Matra-Simca |
Model | SM | M72 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |