1972 Citroen SM vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2000 Rover 45. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 45.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 45. (127 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 2000 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Citroen | Rover |
| Model | SM | 45 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
