1972 Citroen SM vs. 2002 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2002 Skoda Superb is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Superb (190 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Superb (280 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2002 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 2002 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Citroen | Skoda |
| Model | SM | Superb |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2771 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 237 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2810 mm |
