1972 Citroen SM vs. 2003 Mahindra Scorpio
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio.
Because 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio (260 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2003 Mahindra Scorpio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 2003 Mahindra Scorpio | |
| Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
| Model | SM | Scorpio |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2609 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2690 mm |
