1972 Citroen SM vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | SM | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |