1972 Citroen SM vs. 2004 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2004 Dodge Viper is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 8,275 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Viper (493 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 2004 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Viper (712 Nm) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2004 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | SM | Viper |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 8275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 493 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 712 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2520 mm |