1972 Citroen SM vs. 2004 Holden Combo
To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Holden Combo. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Combo. (133 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2004 Holden Combo | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | SM | Combo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2720 mm |