1972 Citroen SM vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | SM | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3060 mm |