1972 Citroen SM vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 344 kg more than 1972 Citroen SM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | SM | XJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 85 L |