1972 Citroen SM vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM. 2006 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1972 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1972 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | SM | Epica |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |