1972 Citroen SM vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Citroen SM weights approximately 96 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | SM | 6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 64 L |