1972 Citroen SM vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | SM | Compass |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2640 mm |