1972 Citroen SM vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (105 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | SM | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 105 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2788 mm |
