1972 Citroen SM vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 2010 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | SM | F-250 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 494 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3967 mm |