1972 Citroen SM vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.

Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1972 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1972 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Citroen SM 2010 Toyota 4Runner
Make Citroen Toyota
Model SM 4Runner
Year Released 1972 2010
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2668 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 180 HP 270 HP
Torque 231 Nm 376 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4823 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1925 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1885 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2789 mm