1972 Citroen SM vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | SM | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 158 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3010 mm |