1972 Citroen SM vs. 2011 Volvo V50
To start off, 2011 Volvo V50 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo V50 (227 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo V50 (320 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM. 2011 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 1972 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1972 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 2011 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | SM | V50 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 227 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4521 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1499 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2639 mm |
