1972 DAF 66 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1972 DAF 66 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 144 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 DAF 66 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | 66 | FX |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 826 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2620 mm |
