1972 DAF 66 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1972 DAF 66 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 284 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 DAF 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | DAF | Jeep |
Model | 66 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1972 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 826 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2040 mm |