1972 DAF 66 vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 544 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Falcon (228 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 1980 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 66 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 826 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2830 mm |