1972 DAF 66 vs. 1999 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1999 SsangYong Korando is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1999 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 DAF 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 SsangYong Korando (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1999 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 1999 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | DAF | SsangYong |
Model | 66 | Korando |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |