1972 DAF 66 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (280 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 DAF 66 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | DAF | Renault |
| Model | 66 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2680 mm |
